However, our strong bias to loss aversion means that many players will attempt to keep the knight in play, and potentially recapture the pawn for material balance. When the opponent responds to the Vienna Gambit with Nc6, it’s automatically +2 for white as the least worse line for black at this point is losing a pawn, and losing tempo with their knight being forced to undevelop. Practically all other intuitive looking responses to the Vienna Gambit are bad for black. D6, which looks suboptimal as it seemingly blocks in the dark square bishop, is suboptimal but certainly not terrible. One of the most common responses is Nc6 and I recently made an entire video on why you shouldn’t play this move! Today, I played an opponent much stronger than me who played this line, and their intuitive and natural moves in the opening demonstrate why the Vienna Gambit is so powerful. But how does one decline the gambit The best response is the somewhat unintuitive d5, which enters the Vienna Game Main Line.
The e-pawn is taboo, but several other moves seem fine, but when preparing you really shouldnt rely too much on your. I’ve described a number of times that few people decline the gambit with the only objectively good move, d5, which enters the Vienna Game Main Line. Queens Gambit Accepted 6.0-0 a6 7.Nc3 b5 8.Be2 D27 The critical theoretical position in Cheparinov, I - Yu Yangyi arises after 13.e4, but before that various transpositions (even from a Semi-Slav, for example) were possible. As I’ve gone up in rating to the 1300s, I’ve noticed that relatively fewer opponents accept the gambit, but try to decline it. The Vienna Gambit is simply a very fun opening to play.
0 kommentar(er)
